<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Now, A Different View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nowadifferentview.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nowadifferentview.com</link>
	<description>Changing the discussion by changing the question. An alternative for 2012</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failure to Lead: An Explanation by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nowadifferentview.com/2010/03/11/failure-to-lead-an-explanation/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowadifferentview.com/?p=157#comment-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; It is an old and a true maxim, that a “drop of honey catches more flies than a gallon of gall.” So with men.&quot;

But Congressional Republicans are not &quot;men&quot;.  They are, each and every one, liars and hypocrites.  EVERY SINGLE ONE has &quot;government-run&quot; health care -- and it&#039;s fine for them but not for their constituents.

Obama has tried persuasion.  Again and again.  And the liars and hypocrites have just lied about him not doing so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; It is an old and a true maxim, that a “drop of honey catches more flies than a gallon of gall.” So with men.&#8221;</p>
<p>But Congressional Republicans are not &#8220;men&#8221;.  They are, each and every one, liars and hypocrites.  EVERY SINGLE ONE has &#8220;government-run&#8221; health care &#8212; and it&#8217;s fine for them but not for their constituents.</p>
<p>Obama has tried persuasion.  Again and again.  And the liars and hypocrites have just lied about him not doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Opportunity to Govern (updated) by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nowadifferentview.com/2010/01/24/another-opportunity-to-govern/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowadifferentview.com/?p=148#comment-67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama had a Q&amp;A with the slime today.  Did the Deciderer ever have such a conversation with the Dems (who never voted to protect rapists!)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama had a Q&amp;A with the slime today.  Did the Deciderer ever have such a conversation with the Dems (who never voted to protect rapists!)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Democrats worst nightmare, Themselves by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nowadifferentview.com/2010/01/15/the-democrats-worst-nightmare-themselves/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowadifferentview.com/?p=145#comment-66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[[false brandishing of the hand across the aisle]]

After years of calling those who disagreed with them &quot;traitors&quot;, the slime now say that not agreeing with them 100% is &quot;false brandishing of the hand across the aisle&quot;.

Yay, slime!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[[false brandishing of the hand across the aisle]]</p>
<p>After years of calling those who disagreed with them &#8220;traitors&#8221;, the slime now say that not agreeing with them 100% is &#8220;false brandishing of the hand across the aisle&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yay, slime!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Opportunity to Govern (updated) by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nowadifferentview.com/2010/01/24/another-opportunity-to-govern/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowadifferentview.com/?p=148#comment-65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[[President Obama needs to lead the discussion by passing a full olive branch across the aisle. ]]

Every single Republican voted in favor odf aiding and abetting rapists (see the Frankin Amendment).  Not one repudiated the stupid repitition of &quot;death panels&quot;.  Obama got into this mess by reaching out to Republicans (does the name Olympia Snowe ring a bell?).  Pardon my bluntness but f*ck the slime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[[President Obama needs to lead the discussion by passing a full olive branch across the aisle. ]]</p>
<p>Every single Republican voted in favor odf aiding and abetting rapists (see the Frankin Amendment).  Not one repudiated the stupid repitition of &#8220;death panels&#8221;.  Obama got into this mess by reaching out to Republicans (does the name Olympia Snowe ring a bell?).  Pardon my bluntness but f*ck the slime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Opportunity to Govern: The Obama Healthcare speech (Updated) by Another Opportunity to Govern &#171; Now, A Different View</title>
		<link>http://nowadifferentview.com/2009/09/09/an-opportunity-to-govern-the-obama-healthcare-speech/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Opportunity to Govern &#171; Now, A Different View]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowadifferentview.com/?p=130#comment-64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] An Opportunity to Govern: The Obama Healthcare speech&#160;(Updated)  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Opportunity to Govern: The Obama Healthcare speech&nbsp;(Updated)  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Frantically False Innovation by martygl</title>
		<link>http://nowadifferentview.com/2009/06/24/frantically-false-innovation/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martygl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowadifferentview.com/?p=112#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;for the record, google made their fortune through a simple but important insight about searching documents for relevance to a query, and by finding pragmatic, effective solutions to a variety of problems having to do with scale.&quot;

I agree on Google. They created an important step forwrad in search, I use them as a reference only to point out how hard it is to maintain that innovation process.  

I also agree that incremental improvements provide value.

I clearly believe that much of what is hyped as innovation is not, it is me too or recycled ideas.  It is a broad brush, I admit, the exceptions, as pointed out by others, seem to me to support the point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;for the record, google made their fortune through a simple but important insight about searching documents for relevance to a query, and by finding pragmatic, effective solutions to a variety of problems having to do with scale.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree on Google. They created an important step forwrad in search, I use them as a reference only to point out how hard it is to maintain that innovation process.  </p>
<p>I also agree that incremental improvements provide value.</p>
<p>I clearly believe that much of what is hyped as innovation is not, it is me too or recycled ideas.  It is a broad brush, I admit, the exceptions, as pointed out by others, seem to me to support the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Frantically False Innovation by russell</title>
		<link>http://nowadifferentview.com/2009/06/24/frantically-false-innovation/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowadifferentview.com/?p=112#comment-32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m generally in agreement with the idea that real value, and the growth and economic health that comes from it, is rarely the result of just packaging old stuff in a shiny new wrapper.

that said, a couple of comments.

for the record, google made their fortune through a simple but important insight about searching documents for relevance to a query, and by finding pragmatic, effective solutions to a variety of problems having to do with scale.

they are in a kind of &quot;hey, me too&quot; mode now but that&#039;s not what made them what they are.

really game-changing innovation happens when it happens, and is hard to predict.  most times, innovations happen as solutions to specific problems that exist in the here-and-now.  

because it&#039;s driven by issues presented by, and occurs in the context of, existing technologies and practices, innovations are by nature most often incremental.  and quite often, there&#039;s real value to be found there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m generally in agreement with the idea that real value, and the growth and economic health that comes from it, is rarely the result of just packaging old stuff in a shiny new wrapper.</p>
<p>that said, a couple of comments.</p>
<p>for the record, google made their fortune through a simple but important insight about searching documents for relevance to a query, and by finding pragmatic, effective solutions to a variety of problems having to do with scale.</p>
<p>they are in a kind of &#8220;hey, me too&#8221; mode now but that&#8217;s not what made them what they are.</p>
<p>really game-changing innovation happens when it happens, and is hard to predict.  most times, innovations happen as solutions to specific problems that exist in the here-and-now.  </p>
<p>because it&#8217;s driven by issues presented by, and occurs in the context of, existing technologies and practices, innovations are by nature most often incremental.  and quite often, there&#8217;s real value to be found there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Frantically False Innovation by martygl</title>
		<link>http://nowadifferentview.com/2009/06/24/frantically-false-innovation/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martygl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowadifferentview.com/?p=112#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turbulence,
The key to this, from my standpoin,t is the hyping of minor steps forward at the expense of potential real innovation.  I see many things get cheaper and faster. I think VMWare is great, it is just not a new idea.  I think an understanding of the history of these technologies is a good thing to have.  Most important, to me, is that we aggressively search for new things rather than new ways to package old things.

I have only browsed through the Vertica website, but like Wolfram Alpha, I do find it intriguing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turbulence,<br />
The key to this, from my standpoin,t is the hyping of minor steps forward at the expense of potential real innovation.  I see many things get cheaper and faster. I think VMWare is great, it is just not a new idea.  I think an understanding of the history of these technologies is a good thing to have.  Most important, to me, is that we aggressively search for new things rather than new ways to package old things.</p>
<p>I have only browsed through the Vertica website, but like Wolfram Alpha, I do find it intriguing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

